The Fiery Stones, Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28: A Theological and Cosmological Analysis in Light of the Divine Council

Introduction
The passages in Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28 are among the most discussed and at the same time most complex texts within Old Testament theology. Traditionally, these sections are read as taunt songs against earthly kings—namely the king of Babylon and the king of Tyre. At the same time, both texts display characteristics that extend beyond merely human referents. In particular, Ezekiel 28:14–16 raises questions about the identity of a being who is “on the holy mountain of God” and walks “among the fiery stones.”

Within recent academic discussion, Michael S. Heiser has convincingly argued that these passages do not refer exclusively to human kings, but contain a dual reference: both earthly rulers and spiritual beings within the divine council. This article examines the relationship between Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28, with particular attention to the motif of the fiery stones, and substantiates the thesis that these texts refer to fallen heavenly entities.

Historical-Literary Context of Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28
Isaiah 14:12–15 describes the fall of “Helel ben Shachar” (morning star, son of the dawn):

“How you have fallen from heaven, morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!” (Isa. 14:12)

Although the immediate context refers to the king of Babylon (Isa. 14:4), the language transcends the human domain. The description of a fall “from heaven” and the ambition to “ascend above the stars of God” points to a cosmic dimension.

Likewise, Ezekiel 28:12–17 describes the king of Tyre in terms that are difficult to interpret as purely human:

“You were in Eden, the garden of God… You were an anointed guardian cherub… You walked among the fiery stones.” (Ezek. 28:13–14)

The reference to Eden, a cherubic status, and access to the “mountain of God” suggests a pre-earthly, heavenly identity.

The Divine Council and Spiritual Beings
Heiser places these texts within the broader framework of ancient Near Eastern cosmology and the biblical portrayal of a heavenly council. In texts such as Psalm 82 and 1 Kings 22, God is depicted as king among other heavenly beings. These “sons of God” (bene elohim) function as spiritual authorities under God’s sovereignty.

According to Heiser, Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28 reflect the fall of such beings. He states:

“The language of these passages is simply too exalted and otherworldly to be restricted to human rulers alone.”¹

The kings of Babylon and Tyre function in this reading as earthly manifestations or representatives of underlying spiritual powers—a concept also visible in Daniel 10, where territorial “princes” are mentioned.

The Meaning of the Fiery Stones (Ezekiel 28:14–16)
The motif of the “fiery stones” (’abnê-’ēš) is unique and calls for closer analysis. The text states:

“You walked among the fiery stones.” (Ezek. 28:14)

Within Old Testament symbolism, fire is closely associated with God’s holiness and presence (cf. Exodus 24:17; Daniel 7:9–10). The “stones” can be understood as elements of the heavenly throne room or as representations of divine glory and purity.

Heiser interprets this passage as a description of access to the immediate presence of God:

“The ‘stones of fire’ likely refer to the radiant, fiery presence of God’s throne room—imagery associated with divine council scenes.”²

This places the described being not merely in a symbolic garden, but in the cosmic temple—the heavenly Mount Zion, where heaven and earth intersect.

Intertextual Connections between Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28
Both passages share striking thematic parallels.

First, there is an exalted status: a being located in heaven (Isa. 14) or on the mountain of God (Ezek. 28).

Second, pride is identified as the central sin:

“You said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to the heavens…’” (Isa. 14:13)
“Your heart became proud because of your beauty…” (Ezek. 28:17)

Third, there is a subsequent downfall:

“But you are brought down to the realm of the dead…” (Isa. 14:15)
“So I threw you to the earth…” (Ezek. 28:17)

These parallels support the thesis that both texts refer to an archetypal rebellion of a heavenly being—a motif later echoed in the New Testament in references to the fall of Satan (cf. Luke 10:18).

Rebellion in the Heavenly Realm
Within Heiser’s framework, these passages are part of a broader pattern of three major rebellions: the fall in Eden (Gen. 3), the rebellion of the “sons of God” (Gen. 6:1–4), and the scattering at Babel (Gen. 11; cf. Deut. 32:8–9 LXX).

Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28 provide insight into the first and foundational rebellion: that of a high-ranking heavenly being who abused his position. This rebellion has both cosmic and earthly consequences, with human kingdoms functioning as extensions of spiritual realities.

This aligns with Paul’s perspective in the New Testament:

“For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities…” (Eph. 6:12)

Conclusion
The analysis of Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28 demonstrates that these texts cannot be adequately understood without taking into account their cosmological and theological depth. The descriptions of a fall from heaven, a presence in Eden, a cherubic role, and walking among fiery stones transcend the merely human domain.

In line with the interpretation of Michael Heiser, it can be concluded that these passages contain a dual reference: they speak both of historical kings and of the spiritual powers operating behind them. The “fiery stones” function as a key motif pointing to proximity to God’s throne and the tragedy of a fallen heavenly being expelled from that holy realm.

This perspective restores the Old Testament texts to their original worldview, in which heaven and earth are not separate domains, but deeply interconnected realities within God’s cosmic governance.

Application for Acquittal (Vrijspraak) and Deliverance
Within the framework of Acquittal and the Courts of Heaven, Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28 gain direct pastoral and juridical relevance. These texts reveal that pride, rebellion, and self-exaltation are not merely human weaknesses, but participations in an ancient cosmic revolt. In deliverance ministry, this means that “legal grounds” are often rooted in agreements (conscious or unconscious) with these patterns of rebellion against God’s order.

Acquittal therefore begins with identification and confession: breaking every identification with pride, independence, and self-exaltation, and restoring submission to God’s kingship. In the heavenly court, on the basis of the blood of Christ, it is pleaded that every accusation arising from this rebellion is nullified, and that the believer is repositioned into his original calling: walking in holiness, in God’s presence—not among the “fiery stones” as a fallen being, but as a restored son with free access to the throne of grace.

Spirit-Filled King-Priest according to the Order of Melchizedek
In extension of these passages, it becomes evident that earthly kings in Scripture often function as carriers or manifestations of underlying spiritual powers—as seen implicitly in Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28, and more explicitly in Daniel 10. Demonically inspired rulership is characterized by pride, exploitation, and the demand for worship, reflecting the original rebellion.

In contrast stands the restoration of humanity in Christ as a king-priest “according to the order of Melchizedek” (cf. Psalm 110; Hebrews 7). In this order, authority is not exercised from independence, but from union with God, characterized by righteousness and peace.

For deliverance and Acquittal, this implies a fundamental repositioning: from subjection to demonically inspired systems to participation in the royal priesthood of Christ. The believer receives exousia (delegated authority) not only to maintain personal freedom, but also to confront territorial and societal influences—not through striving in personal strength, but through juridical and spiritual representation of the finished work of Christ within the heavenly order.

Reflection Questions
1.In what ways do I recognize patterns of pride, independence, or self-exaltation in my own life that may form a “legal ground”—and am I willing to confess and break these in the Courts of Heaven?
2.Where have I (consciously or unconsciously) allowed authority or influence from systems, structures, or people that are not aligned with God’s order, and how can I reposition myself under the kingship of Christ?
3.How do I practically live as a king-priest according to the order of Melchizedek—in my prayer life, decisions, and influence—so that I not only receive freedom but also become a channel of righteousness and restoration for others?

Bibliography

Heiser, Michael S. The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2015.

Heiser, Michael S. Demons: What the Bible Really Says About the Powers of Darkness. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2020.

Walton, John H. Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2006.

Block, Daniel I. The Book of Ezekiel: Chapters 25–48. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.

Oswalt, John N. The Book of Isaiah: Chapters 1–39. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986.

¹ Heiser, The Unseen Realm, 87.
² Ibid., 91.

Why Religious and Political Powers Systematically Miss the Kingdom of God

History is not shaped solely by the visible decisions of leaders, governments, or religious institutions. Beneath the surface, a deeper conflict is unfolding—a struggle over thinking, interpretation, and truth. Scripture reveals that moments when human powers believe they have prevailed are often precisely the moments when the Kingdom of God is advancing irreversibly.

The events surrounding the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ provide the clearest example of this pattern. Religious and political leaders were convinced of their correctness, their control, and their success. Reality proved fundamentally different. This article explores how self-deception, worldly wisdom, and spiritual blindness operate together within spheres of influence, and why true wisdom according to Scripture begins with embracing what God Himself calls “foolishness.”

When Leaders Think They Have Won

After the crucifixion, religious leaders and Roman authorities assume the problem has been definitively resolved. Matthew describes how the chief priests and Pharisees approach Pilate with a calculated plan. They remember Jesus’ words about His resurrection and decide to take preventive action: the tomb is sealed and guarded.

The key phrase in this passage is, “it came to our minds.” The conflict is centered on thoughts. Fear of losing face, control, and authority drives their actions. Ironically, they attempt to prevent precisely what God has already determined to accomplish. Their precautions only serve to make the later breakthrough unmistakable.

Thoughts as the Primary Battleground

Scripture is consistent in its diagnosis of spiritual conflict. The primary battleground is not military or political, but mental. Paul states that “the god of this world” blinds the minds of unbelievers so that they cannot see the light of the gospel (2 Cor. 4:4). Elsewhere he warns that thoughts can be led astray from sincere and pure devotion to Christ (2 Cor. 11:3).

Jesus Himself acknowledges that evil thoughts arise from within the human heart (Mark 7:21). Darkness therefore operates both through external deception and through the fallen human nature. This explains why leaders often sincerely believe they are acting rightly while, in reality, participating in processes that oppose God’s purposes.

Paul draws a sharp conclusion. The rulers of this age did not understand God’s wisdom; had they done so, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory (1 Cor. 2:8). This leads to his confronting exhortation: “Let no one deceive himself. If anyone among you thinks that he is wise in this age, let him become a fool that he may become wise” (1 Cor. 3:18).

Religious and Political Spirits at Work

This dynamic becomes visible within societal spheres. Religious systems are often driven by fear of losing control and fear of the free movement of the Holy Spirit. Historically, this has resulted in manipulation, exclusion, and at times violence. Political systems function from fear of losing power and stability, causing truth to be subordinated to pragmatism and self-preservation.

It is theologically sound to speak here of religious and political “spirits” operating through human thinking. This does not deny human responsibility, but acknowledges that structures can open themselves to spiritual influence. Scripture states soberly, “The Lord knows the thoughts of the wise, that they are futile” (1 Cor. 3:20).

What No One Saw Happening

While leaders believed Jesus had been permanently removed, a decisive victory was unfolding in the unseen realm. The New Testament describes how Christ, through His death, rendered powerless the one who holds the power of death (Heb. 2:14), took authority over death and Hades (Rev. 1:18), and disarmed the spiritual powers and authorities, triumphing over them openly (Col. 2:15).

It also speaks of His activity in the spiritual realm, proclaiming to spirits in captivity (1 Pet. 3:18–19) and entering the heavenly sanctuary with His own blood to obtain eternal redemption (Heb. 9:12).

Within classical deliverance and biblical theology, this has long been understood as the heart of the gospel. Derek Prince summarized it succinctly by stating that the cross is not only the place of atonement, but also the place of decisive victory over satanic dominion.

The Sudden Breakthrough of the Kingdom

Matthew does not portray the resurrection as a gradual process, but as a shockwave. There is an earthquake. An angel descends. The stone is rolled away. The guards, representatives of worldly power, fall as though dead.

Only after Christ has completed His work in the heavenly realms does the victory manifest visibly on earth. The angel declares simply what religious and political elites could not grasp: Jesus has done exactly what He said. The resurrection is not an improvisation, but the confirmation of God’s word and God’s timing.

Living from the Mind of Christ

The implication for believers and leaders is profound. Paul states without qualification, “We have the mind of Christ” (1 Cor. 2:16). This demands a deliberate break with fear-driven systems, religious control, and political calculation.

Living from the mind of Christ means learning to discern when wisdom is merely fear in disguise, and when obedience appears as foolishness in the eyes of the world. The Kingdom of God does not manifest through control, but through truth, obedience, and trust.

Conclusion

The events surrounding the tomb of Jesus reveal a pattern that continues to this day. Human powers attempt to rule by shaping thought, perception, and fear. God works straight through these efforts—often unseen, but always decisively.

The question is not whether we live in this world, but from which mindset we live. Paul’s exhortation remains as urgent as ever. Whoever wishes to be truly wise must be willing to become a fool by the standards of this age. That very foolishness proves to be the key through which the Kingdom of God breaks through—in lives, in leadership, and in nations.

Scripture speaks remarkably often about shadow. Not as a vague metaphor, but as a spiritual reality. Sometimes that shadow is threatening, cold, and suffocating: the shadow of death. At other times, the very same word describes safety, covering, and rest: the shadow of the Most High. The question is not whether we live in shadow, but under which shadow.

The shadow of death: where light is absent
The Bible is brutally honest about seasons of darkness. Job describes “a land of deepest darkness, of gloom and disorder, where even the light is like darkness” (Job 10:22). The Psalms speak of being covered by the shadow of death (Psalm 44:19–20). This is confronting language. At times it can feel as if God Himself has led us into places where clarity, structure, and hope seem to disappear.

The shadow of death is more than physical mortality. It is a spiritual atmosphere where life is diminished, direction is lost, and oppressive powers dominate. Zechariah speaks of people “sitting in darkness and in the shadow of death” (Luke 1:79). They are alive, yet not truly living. Breathing, yet not free.

Scripture also warns of false shadows. Isaiah speaks of seeking refuge in “the shadow of Egypt” — human power, political security, or religious systems — which ultimately leads to shame (Isaiah 30:3). Not every shadow offers protection; some only mimic safety.

The shadow of the Most High: where life is preserved
Opposite the shadow of death stands another reality, radically different: the shadow that comes from God Himself. Not because He removes the light, but because His nearness creates covering.

Isaiah paints the picture:
“A shelter to give shade from the heat by day, and refuge and hiding place from the storm and rain” (Isaiah 4:6).
And again:
“Like the shade of a great rock in a weary land” (Isaiah 32:2).

This shadow is not the absence of light but the result of divine presence. A tree casts shade because it is alive; God provides shade because He is near. Under His shadow, restoration takes place:
“They shall return and dwell beneath his shadow; they shall flourish like the grain” (Hosea 14:7–8).

At times, even people become carriers of that life-giving shadow. In Acts we read that the sick hoped “at least Peter’s shadow might fall on some of them” (Acts 5:15). Not because shadow itself has power, but because God’s life was flowing so strongly through a yielded vessel that it overflowed beyond him.

The turning point: light within the shadow
The gospel presents Jesus as the decisive answer to the shadow of death. Matthew explicitly connects His coming to Isaiah’s prophecy:
“The people dwelling in darkness have seen a great light… on those dwelling in the land and shadow of death, a light has dawned” (Matthew 4:16; Isaiah 9:2).

Notice this carefully: the light appears within the shadow, not after it disappears. Psalm 23 does not promise the removal of the valley, but the presence of the Shepherd:
“Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for you are with me” (Psalm 23:4).

The decisive issue is not whether we pass through shadow, but who walks with us there.

Living under the right shadow
Ecclesiastes reminds us that our days on earth are “like a shadow” (1 Chronicles 29:15). Life is temporary. Precisely for that reason, positioning matters. The wicked becomes a fading shadow with no future (Ecclesiastes 8:13), but the one who dwells with the Most High finds stability, direction, and life.

God is the Father of lights, “with whom there is no variation or shadow due to change” (James 1:17). His shadow is trustworthy. It does not shift with circumstances but remains where He is.

Closing reflection
Everyone lives in the shadow of something. The real question is this:
Do you live under a shadow that steals life, or under a shadow that preserves it?
The shadow of death is real, but it does not have the final word. Over it, a greater light has dawned, and beneath that light falls another shadow — the shadow of the Most High.

Those who learn to dwell there discover that darkness is no longer the end, but a passage into peace.

Sven Leeuwestein
Founder Nations Ablaze

Every now and then, you come across a comment about a prophetic ministry or utterance. What often stands out is that the person making the comment assumes they are able to test what they hear, relying on “common sense and the Holy Spirit.” But is that really the case?

A well-known verse often quoted in these situations comes from the First Letter of John:

“Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God” (1 John 4:1).

What many don’t realize is that these words were written in a context of traveling preachers and a Hellenistic culture in which public oratory and persuasive power were highly valued — even apart from truth. It was precisely in that setting that John urged believers to exercise spiritual discernment amid the many spirits (read: voices) in their world. But that raises a piercing question for me: what if you are the one who claims to test the spirits, but are not actually speaking from the Spirit of God?

Don’t Believe Everything You Hear

The first readers of this letter were tasked with forming and guarding their emerging faith and tradition. They were confronted with many winds of doctrine, while they did not yet have access to the New Testament as we know it today. In 1 John 4:1, John uses the Greek word pisteuete, the imperative form of pisteuō, which comes from pistis, meaning faith, trust, or faithfulness. The original Greek reads: “Do not believe every spirit” (πιστεύετε μὴ παντὶ πνεύματι). John is calling his readers not to accept every spiritual impression or revelation. This is not about shallow skepticism, but an active command not to place trust in everything that sounds spiritual. It implies that it is entirely possible — even with sincere intentions — to believe something that is not from God if it is not spiritually tested.

At that time, discernment did not happen by measuring against a complete canon of Scripture. Instead, other reference points were used. Loving apostolic leadership and authority — the very purpose of this letter — played a central role: what had the apostles taught, and what had they received from Jesus? In addition, the testimony of the Holy Spirit, working in the community, provided discernment. Communal discernment — praying, listening, and testing together — helped distinguish truth from deception. The most eloquent speaker did not have the final say, as was often the case in Greco-Roman culture, but rather the anointed leading of the Spirit in connection with apostolic teaching.

In Acts 15, for example, we see how the early church made decisions through a combination of testimony, Scripture, apostolic authority, and the guidance of the Holy Spirit:

“It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us…” (Acts 15:28).

And Paul urges the believers in Thessalonica:

“Do not quench the Spirit. Do not treat prophecies with contempt but test them all; hold on to what is good” (1 Thess. 5:19–21, NIV).

Criticism or Discernment?

In a time where everyone has a voice — and can express it instantly online — it’s tempting to automatically place ourselves on the side of the light. Especially when it comes to prophecy or spiritual revelation: we sense something is off, quote 1 John 4:1 (“Do not believe every spirit…”), and seem to have no doubt about our own ability to discern. But the question we rarely ask is: what if I myself am the one speaking from the spirit of the world and not from the Spirit of God?

There is a difference between critical evaluation and spiritual discernment. Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 2:11–12 that only the Spirit of God knows what is in God, and that we have received that Spirit so that we may understand what God has freely given us. Discernment, then, is not merely a rational analysis — it is an act of dependency on and intimacy with the Spirit. And the Spirit calls for surrender, humility, and often repentance from pride, bitterness, or personal bias. It is a conscious decision, but also a process toward spiritual maturity, in which we learn to distinguish our own voice from that of the Holy Spirit.

“Whoever claims to test, must be willing to be tested themselves.”

One of the most difficult things to recognize is that the spirit of the world can also express itself through seemingly Christian language. Phrases like “I just feel this isn’t right,” or “this ministry is unhealthy,” are sometimes spoken without knowing the actual fruit or having spiritually discerned the person or sources involved. What if statements like that — even if well-intentioned — actually make you part of the confusion or resistance against the work of the Spirit?

Christians who are less familiar with prophetic functioning within the Body of Christ often tend to speak from the soul — or put differently, from discomfort with the supernatural. They use the word “discernment” or “testing,” but sometimes that masks an inability or unwillingness to recognize spiritual growth in others, hidden behind theological terms or vague, postmodern statements without biblical grounding.

Are You Working With the Spirit — or Against Him?

The most prophetic words often sound uncomfortable, strange, or even offensive. Jesus Himself was considered a heretic. The prophets of the Old Testament were mocked, imprisoned, or ignored. And it is striking that it was often the religiously devout who were the fiercest critics. So ask yourself this: am I truly speaking on behalf of the Spirit of God, or am I speaking from my own judgment, pain, fear, or theological preference?

"The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom." (Proverbs 9:10).

 This is especially true in the context of prophecy and judgment. False or soulish prophecy is not something only others do. It can arise in our own words when we have failed to discern the source. Pious criticism without relationship with the Spirit quickly becomes religious resistance to renewal and truth.

What if you are the one speaking from habit or woundedness, while thinking you’re acting in purity? What if your words undermine a ministry or person in your church or movement who is walking obediently in the path of the prophetic Spirit? What if your “testing” is actually projection? Then you — unconsciously — become a soulish or even false voice in the work of the Spirit. Not because you intend to deceive, but because you are not speaking from the Spirit of God.

What Can You Do?

I can’t imagine anyone would want to fall into this. Still, there are concrete steps you can take to better engage with the prophetic in the Body of Christ. Here are three.

Start with deliverance in the Courts of Heaven. Much spiritual blindness or resistance comes from generational iniquity, accusations, or inner ties to religious or controlling spirits. In the Courts of Heaven — as seen in Daniel 7:10 and Zechariah 3 — God offers a way to acquittal, restoration, and breakthrough. This form of spiritual deliverance can free you from blockages that cloud your discernment.

Next, attend a sound prophetic school and invest in theological depth. Spiritual discernment is not merely a spontaneous gift but a skill that grows through training, surrender, and healthy guidance. A prophetic school helps you hear God’s voice, test prophecy, and learn how to serve others skillfully in love and truth (Eph. 4:11–13; 1 Cor. 14:1). Combine this with theological training that teaches you how to handle Scripture for yourself — ideally without excessive dogmatic coloring from teachers who, quite frankly, may also benefit from this message.

Finally, learn to test biblically together, just like the early church. In the early church, prophecy wasn’t judged in isolation but discerned communally:

“Two or three prophets should speak, and the others should weigh carefully what is said” (1 Cor. 14:29, NIV).

This is a vital key. You don’t stand alone — Jesus Himself, the testimony of all true prophecy, has promised to reveal Himself in the assembly. (Matt. 18:20).

Today, we are also blessed with the written Word. Test prophetic inspiration together, “in the Word with the Word,” in prayer and humility. And then act on it. Prophetic revelation calls for a mature, Spirit-led response — especially from apostolic teams, churches, and movements.

“Sometimes, we ourselves are the voice we so desperately want to unmask.”

So, how do you discern spirits — including your own? The answer is not: always remain silent. But it is: speak with care. Pray, fast if needed, and be humble in your judgment. Let others test your words — people who walk in wisdom and the Spirit. And ask the Holy Spirit again and again: Lord, am I the one resisting You?

Because sometimes… we are the very voice we so passionately want to expose.

Sven Leeuwestein

Recently, I watched Conclave on Amazon Prime – partly out of my ongoing fascination with spiritual leadership, and also intrigued by the timing. Ralph Fiennes plays the lead role. While I didn’t fully connect with some of the underlying messages and found the casting of familiar faces as cardinals a bit overdone, the film still offered a compelling glimpse into what the researchers behind the production wanted to show us about leadership transitions.

Whenever a pope dies or resigns, the world’s media flocks to a ceremony steeped in both mystery and historical gravity: the conclave. Derived from the Latin cum clave – “with key” – it refers to the cardinals being literally locked away until they’ve selected a new pope through prayer and deliberation. The Roman Catholic Church treats this transition as a sacred responsibility, trusting that the Holy Spirit will lead the process. The color of the smoke rising from the chapel’s chimney signals whether a decision has been made.

With a touch of nostalgia, I find myself asking – recalling those idealistic seminary days – how do Protestant, Baptist, and Evangelical churches handle leadership transitions? And what can we learn today from Scripture, early church history, and even the Catholic tradition?


The Conclave: Ceremony, Prayer, and Spiritual Responsibility

During a conclave, all eligible cardinals gather in the Sistine Chapel in Vatican City. Voting is secret and requires a two-thirds majority. Each round is preceded by prayer, and the faithful believe the Holy Spirit leads the process.

“The conclave is not a political convention, but a spiritual event. It is the Spirit who leads, not merely strategy.”
— Pope Benedict XVI

The newly elected pope is revealed when white smoke rises from the chapel’s chimney — a visible sign that consensus has been reached.



Protestant and Evangelical Leadership Transitions: Diverse and Charismatic

Unlike the centralized structure of the Catholic Church, leadership transitions in Protestant circles are often decentralized. Yet here too, deep prayer, communal discernment, and prophetic insight play a role.

In most Protestant traditions, pastors are appointed based on theological training, character, spiritual gifts, and a recognized sense of calling—both personally and communally. In Reformed churches, this typically happens through church councils or regional assemblies. In more Evangelical and charismatic contexts, the process often includes prophetic confirmation and communal prayer.

“Timothy, my son, I am giving you this command in keeping with the prophecies once made about you…”
(1 Timothy 1:18)

The Greek word used for “command” here is παραγγελία (parangelia) — a term that implies both instruction and spiritual charge, pointing to leadership as a divinely inspired calling rather than a mere organizational appointment.



Baptists: Autonomy and Calling

Baptist churches are typically congregational in structure, meaning each local church governs itself. Leaders are often elected by the congregation after a process involving sermons, interviews, and prayer. This leads to the familiar “church meeting with ballots” approach.

The emphasis lies on personal calling and communal affirmation. Acts 13:2 speaks directly to this kind of spiritual appointment:

“While they were worshiping the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, ‘Set apart for Me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.’”
(Acts 13:2)

The phrase “set apart for Me” (ἀφορίσατε δή μοι) implies a sacred consecration—not based on hierarchy, but on divine appointment and recognition.



Charismatic-Evangelical Churches: Apostolic and Prophetic Affirmation

In charismatic and Evangelical contexts, leadership often draws inspiration from New Testament models, such as Jesus selecting the twelve apostles after a night of prayer:

“One of those days Jesus went out to a mountainside to pray, and spent the night praying to God. When morning came, he called his disciples to him and chose twelve of them, whom he also designated apostles.”
(Luke 6:12–13)

This form of leadership transition is relational, spiritually guided, and often includes prophetic confirmation. How it’s structured varies widely between congregations. In some cases, it’s a quiet announcement flowing from an internal succession process; in others—such as with Baptists—it involves a formal process of recognition and congregational approval.

“Give me one hundred preachers who fear nothing but sin and desire nothing but God, and I will shake the world.”
— John Wesley

This reflects the deep conviction that leadership is not primarily about structure but about spiritual authority, character, and calling.


Does the Model Matter?

Yes, the method of appointing leaders in the church absolutely matters. Each model—whether a Catholic conclave or a Baptist ballot—carries both spiritual power and inherent vulnerability. Here are three key advantages and challenges:

1. Democracy doesn’t naturally belong in the Church.
While voting and participation can foster involvement, spiritual leadership is not a popularity contest. Scripture emphasizes divine selection through the Spirit (Acts 13:2), prophetic affirmation (1 Timothy 1:18), and prayerful discernment (Luke 6:12–13).

“The church is not a democracy. Christ is the head, and where He reigns, self-interest dies.”
— Dietrich Bonhoeffer

In practice, voting often causes delays due to dissenters or hidden agendas. Change is uncomfortable for many, and resistance can rise quickly. In some Evangelical churches, this puts spiritual unity and renewal under strain, giving way to personal preferences rather than Spirit-led vision.

2. Spiritual maturity is assumed but not guaranteed.
We often assume that believers can discern the voice of the Spirit, but Hebrews 5:14 reminds us:

“Solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil.”

Not every church member or elder is spiritually equipped at that level. Elections can become more reflective of group dynamics than divine guidance. Many churchgoers have sat awkwardly through Q&A sessions, listening to “Aunt Jannie” raise concerns about a leader’s theology or character—while everyone suspected her objections had more to do with unresolved issues than discernment. This raises fair questions about whether every voice should automatically carry weight.

3. Jealousy, power, and politics are ever-present threats.
Even in the most prayerful environments, envy, rivalry, and hidden motives can surface. As James 3:16 warns:

“Where you have envy and selfish ambition, there you find disorder and every evil practice.”

This is true even in conclaves—and no less in church councils or prophetic gatherings.

“The Church is holy, but made up of sinners. Let every appointment be bathed in tears and prayer.”
— Augustine of Hippo

The enemy of the Church delights in exploiting woundedness and sin in both leaders and members to tear apart communities. Our nation is strewn with casualties—wounded believers and entire congregations—where spiritual authority was either abused or sabotaged.


What Now?

Leadership transitions are nothing new. From Jesus to the apostles, from Paul to Timothy, from Peter to James as head of the Jerusalem church — God has always raised up leaders for each season. What is new in our day is the rediscovery of apostolic-prophetic leadership, where character is more important than charisma, and anointing follows yieldedness—not the other way around.

Four key truths are emerging again in this season:

1.God builds through people, not just structures. Kingdom growth happens when individuals are formed and made available. Structures are helpful, but never replace calling and formation.

2.Character precedes power. Leadership without integrity leads to spiritual abuse. It’s not about talent or stage presence but about inward surrender to Christ. That’s the kind of vessel power can flow through without causing damage.

3.Anointed, character-driven leadership equips others. Apostolic leaders empower, release, and think in terms of legacy and mandates. They don’t control; they multiply, release, and send.

4.There is a restoration of biblical leadership models. The Spirit is reawakening the fivefold ministry (apostle, prophet, evangelist, pastor, teacher – Ephesians 4:11), where every part takes its place and Christ is truly the Head.


Wherever people gather to be the Church, human ego, pain, and even spiritual darkness show up. Leadership in the Church is profoundly spiritual, vulnerable, and essential. What pains me is that an entire generation is coming to faith—only to enter the raw, broken reality we’ve come to call “church.” Unknowingly, they step into a battlefield of fleshly behavior, demonic strategies, wounded souls, and communities paralyzed by fear or religiosity.

Let us enter into conclave—but first and foremost with the Lord of the harvest. Let us seek Him to appoint leaders who, with both power and character, will establish His blueprint for the many churches still in need of healing or planting—not out of ambition, but out of humility and revelation.

Is it time for new or renewed leadership in your church—or in a church yet to be planted? What color smoke will rise from your chimney?

Sven Leeuwestein

Need guidance? Want to reflect on leadership as a team? Reach out.

In many Christian organizations, subtle tension arises when managers — often individuals with a strong background in business administration — take the helm of spiritually driven initiatives. They are faithful, competent, and well-organized, but may lack the spiritual mandate to guide what is ultimately a supernatural mission. The result is clear: when managers lead Christian organizations, governance suffers. More importantly, the mission itself suffers.

The spiritual leadership needed to discern God’s vision, calling, and timing becomes blended with human planning, control, and risk management. Structure, finances, and policy are important — but never as a substitute for revelation. The result is organizational overload: the board unintentionally assumes spiritual responsibilities it was never designed to carry. The consequences? Confusion, frustration, failed initiatives, the departure of called individuals — and, ultimately, diminished impact.


Biblical Order

The Bible presents a clear model for spiritual leadership within the body of Christ:

“God has placed in the church first of all apostles, second prophets, third teachers…” — 1 Corinthians 12:28

This order is not meant to be rigid or hierarchical, but it does reveal the divine flow of leadership: revelation precedes organization. Apostles and prophets receive direction and vision from heaven; coaches and advisors help ground it; and administrators are tasked with structuring, safeguarding, and supporting it. When that order is reversed, we fall out of sync with heaven’s blueprint. So what goes wrong?


1. Temple Builders Become Temple Guards

Instead of building toward renewal, leaders become fixated on preserving what already exists.

“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs… on the inside you are full of hypocrisy and wickedness.” — Matthew 23:27–28

Here, Jesus confronts religious leaders more concerned with external appearances and preservation of structure than with spiritual life. They admired the beauty of the temple, yet God had no issue tearing it down to establish something greater. God desires to renew hearts and build the temple of the Spirit.

As a leader, be careful not to fall more in love with the wineskin than with the wine it was meant to carry. Consider the Dutch canal network — once vital for transport, now largely unused. It’s okay to look back with a measure of nostalgia, but the past must not govern the present. Many organizations are stuck in memories of what once was, yet fail to recognize the spiritual leadership and pioneering spirit that formed their foundations. Spiritual leaders perceive and establish this instinctively — that’s why they are given.


2. Tentmakers Become Tent Keepers

What was once flexible and mobile becomes static and entrenched.

“By faith he made his home in the promised land like a stranger in a foreign country; he lived in tents… for he was looking forward to the city with foundations…” — Hebrews 11:9–10

This is a trap every organization faces. Turning inward and aging happens naturally; reaching outward and renewing requires intention and courage. Abraham kept moving because he expected something greater. Stagnant leaders, on the other hand, stop expecting and settle into temporary structures.


3. Key Holders Become Gatekeepers

Instead of opening doors, they start closing them — focused on control and restriction.

“I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven…” — Matthew 16:19

Jesus gave us the keys to operate as ambassadors of heaven’s authority. Yet too often, key holders turn into gatekeepers:

“Woe to you experts in the law, because you have taken away the key to knowledge. You yourselves have not entered, and you have hindered those who were entering.” — Luke 11:52

When managers become gatekeepers, they block others from entering into what God is building through the organization. As a result, governance loses its spiritual function — it either lacks spiritual authority or has been silenced. Outwardly, it may look strong, but its spiritual impact and foundations are compromised.


Misconceptions About Spiritual Leadership

There are several persistent “yes, but…” responses that surface in this discussion:

“But a Christian organization isn’t a church?”
True. Yet every Christian organization should still be rooted in the Kingdom of God. It may not be a church, but it is spiritual in nature. The Holy Spirit brings people together around a mission — a unique expression of His Kingdom. In fact, this should be the norm in every sector: spiritual leadership flowing from intimacy with God.

Often, the church background of the board shapes their thinking. Many come from traditional settings where spiritual and practical leadership are strictly separated — a mindset they carry into the organization. They’ve often served on church councils that don’t recognize apostolic authority. This creates a subconscious justification to distrust or exclude spiritual leadership from governance — and the implications for the organization are significant.

In truth, “the church” wields great influence over Christian organizations and often creates a clash between renewal and tradition, between Kingdom breakthrough and religious mindsets. It would be wise to seek church backgrounds that foster a healthy vision of apostolic leadership.

“A spiritual leader isn’t necessarily a better manager?”
Correct. Nor should they be. A spiritual leader isn’t called to replace the board. What’s needed is partnership: spiritual leadership provides direction; the board supports, facilitates, and reflects. When the order is right, both are blessed. It’s like a marriage: the husband initiates, leads, provides, and protects; the wife receives, advises, and multiplies what she’s entrusted with, in wisdom and grace. It’s not a competition, but a complementary design.

Yes, some spiritual leaders are capable administrators. Unfortunately, some board members also assume they are spiritual leaders — when they are not.

“I honestly don’t know any spiritual leaders…”
That’s a painful — but honest — admission. Many spiritual leaders have withdrawn due to control or power struggles. Some have been dismissed, mocked, or dishonored. We need a culture of honor in which they can heal, rise, and be recognized. Many organizations simply don’t know how to identify spiritual leaders — relying instead on human profiles and assumptions, missing God’s design in the process.


What Now?

Let’s not fight each other — the way forward involves restoration in three areas:

1. Heavenly Alignment: Clearing Legal Grounds

Many organizations have spiritually stagnated due to unspoken covenants, dishonor toward God-appointed leaders, or past wounds. The blood of Jesus and the anointing of the Spirit must be applied first. Leaders must acknowledge, confess, and renounce these things before God’s throne — and claim breakthrough based on His righteousness.

“What can I do with you, Ephraim? What can I do with you, Judah? Your love is like the morning mist… Therefore I cut you in pieces with my prophets, I killed you with the words of my mouth; then my judgments go forth like the sun.” — Hosea 6:4–5

Fear, rejection, pride, and religious spirit are real threats to Christian organizations. The absence of foundational experiences — like water and Spirit baptism — among staff members also leaves organizations vulnerable. Without true spiritual cleansing, the enemy retains a foothold. And honestly — if this point causes your managerial eyebrows to rise, you might need to ask how open you really are to spiritual leadership. A strong word, perhaps — but necessary.

2. Right Positioning: Putting the Right People in the Right Roles

Managers are called to manage. But we also need to recognize and empower spiritual leaders: those who walk in intimacy with God, receive vision, and know how to navigate spiritually. Let these individuals form teams where roles are respected and complement one another. Reject the notion that board members are automatically spiritual leaders — that’s a cultural construct, not a biblical principle.

“Peter said to Jesus, ‘Lord, it is good for us to be here. If you wish, I will put up three shelters—one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah.’ While he was still speaking, a bright cloud covered them, and a voice from the cloud said, ‘This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased. Listen to him!’” — Matthew 17:4–5

Everything we build should be done with the awareness that we are citizens of the Kingdom of Heaven. Peter needed to learn this too — he tried to institutionalize a moment, while God was revealing His divine order.

3. Culture of Honor: Investing in Spiritual Leadership

Spiritual leadership doesn’t require a title — it requires recognition. Create space for apostles, prophets, and spiritual thinkers to help build. At the same time, foster a culture in which board members don’t dominate, but serve. Where spiritual leadership is honored, life flows. And yes — spiritual leadership can be developed in those who are called to it. When you invest in them, they will multiply that life throughout the organization and its network.

Final Thought

A Christian organization is not led by strategy alone, but by the Spirit. Managers are essential — but not as spiritual leaders. Let vision flow from the throne of God, and watch how board, organization, and mission flourish together.

“When the queen of Sheba heard about the fame of Solomon and his relationship to the Lord, she came to test Solomon with hard questions.” — 1 Kings 10:1

A well-functioning Christian organization that is both spiritually and strategically sharp will not go unnoticed — neither on earth nor in the spiritual realm.

I recognize that this is a layered and sensitive topic. Different perspectives, experiences, and organizational dynamics are at play. And yes, organizations have real processes and legitimate complexities. Yet this article is an invitation to re-evaluate not just the practical, but the spiritual leadership at the heart of our ministries.

So the real question becomes: Are we building structures that will endure in the light — or allowing space for forces that delay the mission?

Many young ministries copy the behavior and content of pioneers. While it is inspiring to learn from spiritual fathers and mothers, God’s intention is not for us to merely imitate them. He calls us to walk in our unique identity and anointing. In this article, I will discuss three biblical principles that help transition from being a parrot—one who merely repeats what they hear—to an eagle, soaring high in their own God-given destiny.

Receive Revelation Firsthand (Exodus 33:11)

Moses spoke with God face to face, as a man speaks with his friend. His servant Joshua remained in the tent, seeking God’s presence. Instead of relying solely on secondhand revelation from others, God calls us to come into His presence ourselves and hear directly from Him. Jesus said, “My sheep listen to my voice” (John 10:27). A ministry built on a personal walk with God carries His authority and freshness.

It is certainly valuable to spend a season learning from others, but do so with the understanding that God has called you to receive and share revelation yourself. Learn not only from their teachings but also from their walk and lifestyle—how they arrived at that revelation—and apply what you recognize and can integrate into your own life.

Let Your Character Be Shaped (1 Samuel 17:39-40)

David refused to wear Saul’s armor, choosing instead to fight with the weapons he had mastered in the solitude of the fields. Many attempt to wear someone else’s armor, but true authority comes from the process in which God shapes our character. Just as an eagle leaves its nest and learns to ride the wind currents, we must learn to trust the Spirit and allow ourselves to be shaped by the processes God brings into our lives.

Every ministry comes with an unavoidable cost. The Holy Spirit wants to mold you, teach you to die to yourself, and transform your heart to reflect Jesus, so that you build His Kingdom rather than pursuing your own agenda. This process can take many years and is only complete when God says it is.

Move in the Power of the Holy Spirit (Acts 1:8)

Jesus promised that His disciples would receive power when the Holy Spirit came upon them. A ministry without the Spirit’s anointing is merely human effort. The eagle soars effortlessly on the wind currents, while the parrot must work hard to keep flapping its wings. When we are led by the Holy Spirit and His power is at work in us, our ministry will not merely echo others but become a powerful expression of God’s Kingdom.

Ministering in someone else’s anointing is not difficult—many do it eagerly. But who is the anointed one who has served and simultaneously seen their own oil rise through worship, service, prayer, and fasting?

Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 4:19-20:
“But I will come to you very soon, if the Lord is willing, and then I will find out not only what these arrogant people are saying but what power they have. For the kingdom of God is not a matter of talk but of power.”

The true power of God, dunamis, cannot be faked. It is either present in some measure or not at all. A parrot will pretend power is there and mimic what they see, but an eagle soars, learns, and grows in the grace of God. An eagle carries anointing and power.

But Didn’t Paul Say We Should Imitate Leaders?

Yes, he did. Paul encourages us to follow his example, but only to the extent that he himself follows Christ: “Follow my example, as I follow the example of Christ.” (1 Corinthians 11:1).

Paul was a pioneer and a relentless pursuer of God, receiving revelation through deep intimacy with Him. His life was the result of years of preparation, marked by both power and suffering, as well as servanthood. He did not seek fame or a platform but the salvation of his people, living out of a deep love for Jesus.

God does not call us to be parrots, but eagles who operate with discernment, wisdom, and power in their unique calling. Learn from others, but above all, seek Him for yourself, allow your character to be shaped, and move in the power of the Holy Spirit. Then, you will not merely repeat what others say but become a source of life and renewal in the ministry God has entrusted to you.

Sven Leeuwestein
Mentor, Coach, and Advisor in Spiritual Leadership

Nowadays, many people wonder whether certain politicians truly hold power, or if others are pulling the strings in the background. And I am not referring to the influence of lobby groups, but rather the suspicion that real power lies elsewhere. Have you ever considered whether this also happens on a smaller scale within a church? Have you ever been in a situation where you were speaking to someone in a formal leadership position, yet they did not seem to speak as the ultimate decision-maker?

The Hidden Influencers

In some churches and ministries, there may be individuals who shape the direction from behind the scenes, while the official leader does not actually have control. This could be a charismatic personality who has accumulated significant influence, a former pastor who struggles to let go, or a small group within the church council or board that effectively makes the decisions. Often, these are people who have been part of the congregation for years, sometimes even for generations, and have claimed certain privileges. And since a church is not a company but rather a ‘self-organising spiritual community in motion,’ there is more room for ‘strategists’ to impose their vision and beliefs through informal structures with a small change of experiencing any repercussions.

Such individuals often operate subtly and with patience. This dynamic can create uncertainty about who is truly responsible and can be frustrating when conversations with the ‘leader’ seem to have little effect, no matter how friendly and well-intentioned they may appear.

The Leader as a Puppet or a Lone Wolf

Sometimes, leaders are placed in their position by strategists because they possess certain qualities—such as public speaking or organisational skills—but they are not given real decision-making power. This can happen when a church is highly dependent on certain financiers, a dominant theological movement, or even an influential family within the congregation. The leader then becomes more of an executor than a visionary, making crucial decisions less transparent. This can undermine trust in leadership and often leads to disappointment among church members.

Alternatively, the official pastor may find themselves isolated. They may be well aware of the power dynamics at play and would love nothing more than to set things straight and facilitate change, yet they no longer have the support within the congregation to make it happen. Perhaps, in the past, they fought for the right cause but lost too many battles. Maybe they were discredited or simply ignored. Now, they focus, weary and disheartened, on preaching and pastoral care, keeping the church running while waiting for a call to start afresh elsewhere. Unfortunately, one can change congregations, but one cannot escape oneself. In the end, they have transitioned from a pastor to a lone wolf.

Consequences for the Community

When a leader is not actually the leader, it can lead to confusion, frustration, and a lack of direction within the congregation. Members often notice that decisions are inconsistent, there is no clear vision, or changes are constantly reversed. This can also harm the spiritual health of a community, as people feel powerless or suspect hidden agendas at play.

A healthy church structure requires clarity and transparency about who is truly in charge. This calls for a culture where leaders are authentic and accountable, and where decision-making processes are open. Only then can a church or ministry grow in trust and effectiveness.

But Would God Ever Allow This?

In reality, this does happen. God has given His followers the responsibility to know and apply His Word. With real responsibility comes real freedom—and with that, the possibility of choosing a different path. The church has structured itself in various ways to manage or prevent such situations. However, where people work together and practise their faith, power dynamics inevitably emerge.

Follow the Money

How can you determine where the real power lies? The principle of ‘follow the money’ applies here too, in the sense that you can trace decision-making processes. The person who ultimately makes the final decision may very well be one of these hidden leaders.

Look at the power structures and follow ‘the money.’ Where does the influence lie? Who has been in the church the longest? Who is always making phone calls or having private conversations to ‘brief’ an elder or small group leader? Especially in discussions about transition, leadership, and organisational structures—particularly during times of renewal—you will see the true power players at work. Or perhaps they should be called power seekers?

Those who longed to bring renewal, the spiritually inclined, and the leaders appointed by God for a new season often find themselves wounded and adrift in a sea of pain and confusion—torpedoed by these tactical submarines that surface only when it matters most.

What Now?

A healthy church structure requires clarity and transparency about who is truly leading. This calls for a culture where leaders are authentic and accountable, and where decision-making processes are open. Only then can a church or ministry grow in trust and effectiveness. My advice is to build the church with healthy apostles and prophets who possess both strength and character. There are plenty of them floating out there.

Just make sure they are healed first.

Sven Leeuwestein

In many churches and ministries, leadership traditionally emphasizes pastors, teachers, and evangelists. While these roles are essential for the growth and health of the congregation, it is time to acknowledge that they do not possess the full blueprint to lead a movement. The restoration of apostolic and prophetic leadership is necessary, not only to care for the flock but also to bring breakthrough, growth, and spiritual transformation.

The Bible clearly shows that apostles and prophets lay the foundation upon which the church is built. Ephesians 2:20 states: “Built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the chief cornerstone.” This foundation is not merely an optional addition; it is an essential building block that provides stability, vision, and spiritual strength.

Apostolic leadership is pioneering by nature. Apostles break through barriers, build structures, and bring new movements to life. They are not content with the status quo but feel a deep calling to establish new communities and reform existing systems. Paul serves as a powerful example of this. He traveled constantly, planted churches, and equipped leaders to care for the flock. His focus was on building the Kingdom, not merely maintaining the existing community.

Prophetic leadership adds another crucial element. Prophets bring correction, direction, and ensure that a movement remains aligned with God’s voice. Amos 3:7 says, “Surely the Sovereign Lord does nothing without revealing his plan to his servants the prophets.” Without prophetic input, a movement—even with apostolic leadership—risks building on human insight rather than divine revelation. Prophets discern, guard, and warn. They collaborate with apostles but also integrate and connect.

However, when the role of pastor, teacher, or evangelist dominates leadership, limitations arise. A pastor or teacher naturally focuses on the care and well-being of the flock. Their calling is to heal, protect, and teach. This is invaluable within the church, but when this ministry takes the lead, a culture of preservation often develops. The focus shifts more toward protecting what exists rather than exploring new spiritual territories.

Evangelists, on the other hand, burn with passion for souls. They reach out, call for repentance, and bring people to Christ. However, their focus is typically on individuals and the masses, not on long-term structural development within a movement or church. Philip, who led the Ethiopian eunuch to faith (Acts 8:26-40), demonstrates the power of the evangelist’s ministry. But Philip did not stay to build structures; he moved on once his mission was complete.

The danger lies in allowing pastors/teachers or evangelists to lead, as this can cause the church or movement to stagnate. An internal focus develops, and growth or expansion is hindered. The emphasis often shifts to knowledge, safety, or salvation. In contrast, apostolic and prophetic leadership focuses on the bigger picture, encompassing all these aspects and more. Apostles see the long term and build with generations in mind. Prophets guard the spiritual course, ensure deep purification, and bring renewal and direction as needed.

A powerful example of this collaboration is found in Acts 13, where Paul and Barnabas are sent out by the Holy Spirit after a time of fasting and prayer. The Holy Spirit spoke through the prophets in the church, leading to a new apostolic mission. This illustrates how prophetic listening results in apostolic action—a dynamic that characterized the early church and fueled explosive growth.

This does not diminish the value of pastors, teachers, and evangelists. They remain vital to building up the Body of Christ, as Ephesians 4:11 highlights: “So Christ himself gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the pastors and teachers.” Yet, this passage also shows that each ministry has its place. Apostolic and prophetic roles are meant to lead, while the other ministries support, deepen, and strengthen.

Reflecting on the modern church, it is clear to me that the call to restore apostolic and prophetic leadership is growing louder. The world longs for leaders who look beyond the borders of their own communities—leaders who build with a vision that extends beyond the present moment.

I believe that by embracing this shift, we will not only stand stronger as a church or ministry but also serve as instruments of change in society. As Isaiah 58:12 declares: “Your people will rebuild the ancient ruins and will raise up the age-old foundations; you will be called Repairer of Broken Walls, Restorer of Streets with Dwellings.”

The future of spiritual leadership lies in restoring these foundational elements. Apostles build the foundations, prophets provide direction, pastors guard the flock, teachers delve deeply into the Word, and evangelists bring new people in. But to move beyond preservation and experience growth, apostles and prophets must take the lead so that God’s plan can fully unfold.

It is challenging that existing leadership is often reluctant to welcome apostles and prophets. Apostolic builder Dick Westerhof notes, “Our message to pastors and teachers is that they will lose their jobs.” This striking statement pinpoints the heart of the issue.

The apostles and prophets I know are often humble people who have endured years of formation and rejection. For this reason, they are the first to understand the words of the Lord: “Well done, good and faithful servant” (Matthew 25:21, NIV).

The question is: who will have the humility to make room for a stronger foundation? And who has the character to embrace a healthy transition process? Who dares to recognize that their role in today’s church may differ from what they once believed?

Sven Leeuwestein

Sven Leeuwestein advises and coaches leaders in churches, businesses, and governmental organizations at the intersection of spirituality and leadership.

Dare.

It’s a word we often associate with bravery, with grand deeds, or with facing fear. But when Paul writes about daring in 2 Corinthians 11:20-21, he does so with an almost ironic undertone:

“Whatever anyone else dares to boast about—I am speaking as a fool—I also dare to boast about.”

What does he mean here?

Daring means showing courage, having confidence, or taking a bold step. Here, Paul dares to show vulnerability. He doesn’t compare himself out of arrogance but to highlight that true daring lies in staying faithful to your calling, even if it makes you appear weak in the eyes of others. He refuses to be lured by shallow displays of power. Instead, he chooses to embrace his weakness because it is precisely there that God’s strength becomes visible.

As a spiritual leader, you often find yourself in tension. The world around us demands certainty, success—however that might be measured—and visible results. But the calling of a leader in God’s Kingdom requires a different kind of daring. It asks for the courage to be vulnerable, to go against the current, and to openly acknowledge your dependence on God.

Daring doesn’t mean always being strong. It means daring to embrace your weakness. It means having the honesty to admit your struggles and limitations. It means trusting in God’s strength, even when you have no idea how to move forward yourself.

The key

This kind of daring isn’t arrogance or bravado—it’s a humble choice. It’s the boldness to let God’s glory shine through our human weakness.

As a leader, do you dare to trust in God’s strength, even in your vulnerability? Do you dare to take the step of not trying to control everything yourself? It may feel foolish, as Paul says. But in that “foolishness” lies the key to the power God wants to give.

“We are fools for Christ, but you are so wise in Christ! We are weak, but you are strong! You are honored, we are dishonored.” (1 Corinthians 4:10)

I don’t know who exactly Paul’s critics were. But nearly 2,000 years later, I read Paul’s words every day. His courageous “foolishness” as a spiritual leader following Jesus has changed the world.

Be bold. Dare. Not in your own strength, but in His.

On Religion in Ministry

I once had the privilege of speaking at a church where I had been regularly leading services with great joy for many years. It was a dynamic and innovative congregation, where the power of the Spirit was visibly at work through His gifts. I was looking forward to concluding the sermon once again with an invitation to ‘come forward’ for prayer, so that people could be served by God’s tangible and transformative Presence.

Just before the service, the pastor—someone I deeply value and respect—casually approached me. He mentioned that he no longer wanted people to come forward for extended prayer at the front. Instead, those who wanted personal prayer could go to the back of the hall. He had his reasons for this, which I of course respected.

Although I found it difficult, especially since I was excited to serve in that particular way, I submitted as a guest speaker to the policy of the church. The sermon went excellently, and the responses were positive. However, this policy choice raised some questions for me and unexpectedly led me into a phase of reflection and personal growth. Who was I without the moment of power? Had I gotten caught up in a religion of renewal? Was I involved in revivalism?

Isaiah 43:18–19 says

[18] “Do not remember the former things,
Nor consider the things of old.
[19] Behold, I will do a new thing,
Now it shall spring forth; shall you not know it?
I will even make a road in the wilderness
And rivers in the desert.”

There is once again a Spirit of revival sweeping through the land. As a result, there has been an increasing rise of so-called power ministries, which bring renewal to the Body of Christ through events, worship services, and training. The goal of these movements is to stir the church to prayer and repentance and to empower it, so that the church can experience renewal and restoration in the power of the Holy Spirit. I personally enjoy operating in such ministries, though I know that my calling is broader than just this aspect. In such ministry, you experience God up close, the impact of your prayers on people is more noticeable, and you also feel more supernatural love and hope.

These movements or “waves” are not new, however. Throughout church history, we see various waves emerge time and again, each one making a deep impact on people, churches, and existing movements.

Such developments often bring tension when enthusiasts wanting to share their experiences meet established structures, which have already been formed around specific visions and directions. Sudden spiritual renewal can feel like a disturbance or disruption, which often raises questions about theology, but also touches on themes like trust, influence, and status. It’s similar to the impact Uber had on traditional taxi companies: both serve the same target audience in the same field, but one’s vision and strategy may ‘disrupt’ or challenge the other.

Spiritual leaders typically operate from a strong, empowered conviction. Just like in business, you don’t start something only to abandon it after a few years when another strong vision comes along. You often want, consciously or unconsciously, to build something that outlasts you and serves the people you minister to. However, in the Kingdom of God, we are not competitors.

Luke 11:9–13 says:

[9] “So I say to you: Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. [10] For everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened.[11] If a son asks for bread from any father among you, will he give him a stone? [12] Or if he asks for a fish, will he give him a serpent instead of a fish?
[13] If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask Him!”

The words of Jesus in Luke 11 show that His followers could already ask for the Holy Spirit during His life, before His death and resurrection, and the Father would give it to them in a certain way. This is remarkable because at that time, the resurrection and the birth of the Church had not yet taken place. For the followers, the concept of God as Father and the idea of the indwelling of the Holy Spirit in people’s hearts were still new and not well understood.

However, Luke wrote for readers who lived after the resurrection and the birth of the Church and who were already becoming familiar with these concepts. Still, Jesus encouraged His followers to approach God as Father and ask for the Holy Spirit, even though they couldn’t fully understand what this meant. Jesus’ words point forward to a deeper, future fulfillment, where the Holy Spirit would fully dwell in the hearts of believers at Pentecost.

The Bible teaches us that there will always be new insights and revelations from the Holy Spirit, and we must learn to deal with them. A fitting term for this process is “present truth”—describing the process in which each believer, church, or movement finds itself. A truth may already exist but still be unknown to the recipient. The Holy Spirit leads us to discover this existing Truth, which appears new to the believer, church, or movement.

This is how new waves of movements form, as pioneers and reformers begin working with present truth. They build a theology and structure (or “wineskin”) around the spiritual workings and invite others to join them. The remarkable thing is that, even while one wave is still moving (or sometimes completed, though people within that system may not acknowledge it), another wave already begins to emerge. We live in a time where this process seems to be accelerating, even as multiple waves emerge simultaneously—while we must also be alert to both true and false movements—that flow into and permeate the Body of Christ. Factors like the internet, media, and professionalization further speed up this process. For the Church, this is like a “North Sea” of various currents and movements crossing each other and sometimes clashing. A pastor or movement leader can no longer maintain the illusion that congregants or followers are only loyal to “their own group.” Believers are discovering and exploring new insights and influences, integrating them into their collection of beliefs, choices, and priorities—including how they spend their time and money. As the leader of a ship at sea, one must be careful not to grip the rudder too tightly out of fear and control. One must not hold onto what is known more firmly, but continue trusting in the course set by the Creator.

A Religious Mindset in Me and in Us

The pastor’s decision led me to think deeply and invited me to take an honest look in the mirror. As a result, and honestly, I was given the opportunity several times later to reconsider my motivations, beliefs, and roles. Why did it affect me so deeply that I could not do what I was looking forward to? Had I become part of a religion of renewal? Had I become a dealer of renewal?

Luke 3:9 says:

“Indeed, the ax is already laid to the root of the trees. Therefore, every tree which does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.”

This verse reminds us that every ministry must bear fruit, but the fruit itself is not the ultimate goal—God is. Where is the ax in my life?

It seemed like time to do my homework. And if you are wise, you do this with prophets. These are ministries in the church with wisdom and discernment of spirits. They are pray-ers who can see and know quicker and better than others what is right or wrong. They can look straight through you while they themselves have often navigated through difficult times with Jesus for years. I feel blessed with precious gifts around me that I can call my friends and acquaintances.

Let me share some insights I gained during this period of reflection.

1.Renewal is not an end in itself. Moving in a power ministry is valuable, but it is not the highest goal of a Christian. Sometimes a religious mindset within spiritual leadership can define theology and vision, where the role of renewal may be over- or undervalued. Renewal should always serve the building up of the Body of Christ, not merely to amplify the power of the moment. The ultimate goal is to make Christ Himself more visible in our lives and the lives of others. We must be careful that our methods do not become a form of religion—consider altar calls, manifestations, and the often unconscious thinking of ‘anointed and non-anointed’.

2.Believers have different ministries and callings. Each of us carries unique gifts that together form the Body of Christ. Not every believer is called to the same ministry, and this is essential for the health of the church. Consider Elijah and Elisha, two ministries that manifested in different ways in different seasons. The Holy Spirit works through all of us in different ways, tailored to what the church and the world need in each season. This reminds me that the power ministry I was so looking forward to is just one aspect of a much larger plan in which every ministry plays a unique, important role.

3.We are not dealers of renewal. Ministry, whatever its form, is not about ego or self-fulfillment. Any form of service should never be about building one’s own status or satisfaction. The risk is that we, often unconsciously, put our own desires and longings for fulfillment first, instead of God’s will. True ministry is about humbly serving God and others, without focusing on personal recognition or success. We are not dealers of renewal who connect people to ourselves. We are mature vessels of the Kingdom through which revelation and truth may flow to God’s children.

4.Dependency and flexibility are essential in leadership. It is precisely when things do not go as expected that I learn the importance of flexibility in ministry. We must be willing to adjust our plans to align with the policies and vision of the congregation we serve, even when it is frustrating or challenging. This attitude requires us to set aside our personal preferences for the greater good and for the guidance of the Holy Spirit. Sometimes this means concluding, and sometimes it means challenging. But it always means aligning ourselves with God’s leading.

5.It is important to remain flexible and adaptive when leading a church or movement. There is nothing wrong with choosing a clear direction and strategy. However, if what you have built becomes more important than the leading of the Holy Spirit, you risk creating an idol in your sphere of influence. This could even be a church, a movement, or a powerful ministry. There is so much Truth that the Lord wants to reveal to the people you serve today; do not stand in the way. Facilitate and study, and have a soft heart. We remain both students and teachers at the same time.

6.This season of the church is also a great opportunity for the (re-)resurrection of solid home-theologians. I see an urgent need for understandable online platforms that help Christians find their way in the North Sea. Not to fill one’s own parish, but to pass on the passion for the Word, interpretation, and tradition to new generations. It is incomprehensible to me that theological institutions and pastors are not fully engaging with this. Help people navigate theologically at home, I would say. Be more disruptive in your resources and strategy rather than complaining about the storms at sea. Or are you still a dealer of knowledge instead of a channel for the Kingdom?

As I discussed these thoughts prayerfully with prophets I work with, I became aware of my tendency toward religiosity, both in myself and in others. As a ministry of power, it is our job not to give people the idea, consciously or unconsciously, that serving in the anointing during gatherings is the most important thing. Because it is not. Nor should we present renewal as the ultimate goal of our faith life. Our focus must always remain on Christ and His will, not on the form or way in which we serve Him.

Faith renewal is indeed very important, and we should not reject or overlook it. That spiritual leaders still do so today, believing it is not from God or unnecessary, saddens me and gives me a sense of frustration, knowing that they are hindering many believers from receiving the full gospel of the Kingdom rather than offering them an environment where it can break through.

This period of reflection has taught me again that true fruit comes from devotion to Christ, rather than from specific forms of ministry. It compels me to keep my focus on God and the fruit He wants to bear in everything, even in unexpected situations. Ministries of power must be free from religion and control, but remain adaptive and lead by example in following and flexibility.

A well-known pastor often says “character before anointing.” And he is absolutely right. God is looking for mature leaders who, like Jesus, can carry His Spirit for the long haul and faithfully.

God is doing something new— even after previous renewal. Who would have thought? Let’s be careful not to trap emerging spiritual generations in a theology meant for yesterday. That theology and the associated wineskin have their value and purpose, but they are not the final goal—just a part of it. We are not dealers, but simply carriers. New is new, and we do not yet know it. Back to the drawing board, back to the prayer room, back to the mirror. Back to humility.

What now?

Step into the river of renewal, enjoy the flow, and let it transform you completely. It is wonderful. And, leader, repent if you have hindered yourself or others from receiving what the Spirit offers through renewal—especially when you realize that others, for whom you are spiritually responsible, have even surpassed you. This is always a possibility.

When you stand in the river of renewal or serve from that river, do not forget that there is always more. There are many rivers and streams in the Spirit. The heavens in all their dimensions are so much greater. There is still much revelation about existing Truth available. And God continues to do new things, even during and after renewal.

However you turn it, you have to deal with renewal. Whether you seek it, reject it, or serve in it, renewal is a given. But the challenge is to ask yourself, do I miss the renewal within renewal? God is doing new things, don’t miss it by clinging to your cluttered religiosity. No matter how anointed you are.

Sven Leeuwestein advises and mentors leaders in churches, businesses, and politics at the intersection of spirituality and leadership. He is also the founder of Nations Ablaze, a movement that aims to contribute to the coming of the Kingdom by restoring apostolic and prophetic leadership in and through the church in Europe and Asia.

In today’s world, where spirituality and leadership are once again visibly intersecting, the concept of spiritual entrepreneurship is becoming increasingly important. Spiritual entrepreneurship is not merely about achieving success or generating profit; it is about initiating and applying tangible inner inspiration, guided by a deep relationship with Jesus Christ. In this article, I want to highlight the value of this source for leaders in their spheres of influence and how this inspiration can positively impact not only their work but also their surroundings.

Awareness and Connection

Awareness is at the core of spiritual entrepreneurship. A leader who is conscious of intimacy with Jesus in daily life sees beyond earthly goals. This awareness brings a transformation in mindsets, influencing how strategies are approached, how stakeholders are perceived, and how employees are treated. More than that, it helps leaders to listen with an open heart and a humble spirit to what their environment truly needs, acting from a place of compassion and service. It provides clarity on where to focus, helps identify opportunities, and fosters a mindset of unconditional reciprocity.

Jesus inspires us to look beyond our own interests and dive deeper into the purpose that God has given us. A leader rooted in this inspiration experiences a continuous source of strength and wisdom, enabling them to navigate complex challenges with confidence. This awareness of involving Jesus in everything serves as an anchor in times of turmoil and uncertainty, reminding leaders of what truly matters.

Influence

The influence of a spiritual entrepreneur often extends further than we can see. By leading according to the principles of Jesus, leaders can gradually permeate their entire sphere of influence with values such as love, truth, and justice. They become steady ambassadors of hope and inspiration, bringing light to environments where darkness often prevails. And this can happen in a very practical and down-to-earth way.

Inspired leadership means encouraging others to discover their inner calling in Jesus and to live from a place of authentic strength. This creates a multiplication effect: an inspired leader inspires others, especially those who are open to growing and connecting on a deeper level. This is true spiritual influence—the ability to lead others to and on behalf of Jesus through the example we set. It goes beyond modeling Jesus’ leadership; it seeks to share His reign of righteousness and justice unconditionally, pushing back the pressures of darkness step by step.

Inspiration as Fuel

Ultimately, living in a relationship with Jesus is the fuel for spiritual entrepreneurship. Without this source, one risks leading in an empty or merely religious manner, lacking long-term impact. However, Jesus offers us the inspiration to be not only successful but also meaningful and servant-hearted. His life lessons, His words, and His presence remind us of the power of faith, love, and hope as the essential pillars of true impact.

Depth is Strength

In a world that seems to move faster by the day, where we are easily consumed by numbers, results, and deadlines, spiritual entrepreneurship brings us back to what is essential. It teaches us that the true strength of leadership does not lie in the power we hold but in the depth of our relationship with Jesus. A leader who continually draws from this source discovers a new freedom and strength to lead others with wisdom, love, and integrity. In this time, that is the true value of spiritual entrepreneurship.

Ready to Grow?

The good news is that anyone who desires this can begin today. Do you need help removing unnecessary spiritual resistance in your business or teams? Or, as a Christian leader, do you want to cleanse your foundations on a deeper level and step more fully into your spiritual authority?

Sven Leeuwestein